<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>How "natives" think</title>
    <subTitle>about Captain Cook, for example</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Sahlins, Marshall.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xx</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">1995</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>318 pages</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>When Western scholars write about non-Western societies, do they inevitably perpetuate the myths of European imperialism? Can they ever articulate the meanings and logics of non-Western peoples? Who has the right to speak for whom? Questions such as these are among the most hotly debated in contemporary intellectual life. In How "Natives" Think, the distinguished anthropologist Marshall Sahlins addresses these issues head on, while building a powerful case for the ability of anthropologists working in the Western tradition to understand other cultures. In recent years, these questions have arisen in debates over the death and deification of Captain James Cook on Hawaii island in 1779. Did the Hawaiians truly receive Cook as a manifestation of their own God Lono? Or were they too pragmatic, too worldly-wise to accept the foreigner as a god? Moreover, can a "non-native" scholar give voice to a "native" point of view? In his 1992 book, The Apotheosis of Captain Cook, Gananath Obeyesekere used this very issue to attack Sahlins's decades of scholarship on Hawaii. Accusing Sahlins of elementary mistakes of fact and logic, even of intentional distortion, Obeyesekere portrayed Sahlins as accepting a naive, ethnocentric idea of superiority of the white man over "natives" - Hawaiian and otherwise.</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Marshall Sahlins.</note>
  <subject>
    <topic>Ethnology</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Historiography</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Attitudes</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Ethnologists</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Philosophy</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Hawaiian Mythology</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>History</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Ethnology, Polynesia</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc" edition="23">996.90072</classification>
  <identifier type="isbn">9780226733685</identifier>
  <identifier type="isbn">0226733688</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">KOHALIB</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">261016</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20261016202629.0</recordChangeDate>
    <languageOfCataloging>
      <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
    </languageOfCataloging>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
